On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 08:28:28AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Stephen, Rob, > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2018-04-18 07:50:01) > >> The use of of_clk_get_parent_{count,name}() and of_clk_init() is not > >> limited to clock providers. > >> > >> Hence move these helpers into their own header file, so callers that are > >> not clock providers no longer have to include <linux/clk-provider.h>. > >> > >> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> v3: > >> - Add Reviewed-by, > >> - Add SPDX-License-Identifier, > >> - Add to clock section in MAINTAINERS (note that Rob is still listed > >> as a maintainer, too, due to the include/linux/of*.h catch-all > >> rule), > > > > Can you X: out this file so Rob is happy? Or that doesn't work? > > I guess that should work. > > My point here is that due to the catch-all rule, he's listed as maintainer > for of_{dma,gpio,irq,iommu,mdio,net,pci} too, which are all helpers for > other subsystems. Perhaps these should be X'd-out too? > Or is it OK without X-ing them out, as the clock maintainers are now shown, too? > > Rob: What's your preference? It's fine as-is. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html