Hi, On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 09:47:41 +0200 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patch series is a proposal for a new I3C subsystem. This v4 has been sent almost a month ago and I didn't get any feedback so far apart from Rob's R-b. Greg, is there any chance we can get these patches merged in 4.18? If not, could you tell me what should be addressed/improved/reworked? Thanks, Boris > > This infrastructure is not complete yet and will be extended over > time. > > There are a few design choices that are worth mentioning because they > impact the way I3C device drivers can interact with their devices: > > - all functions used to send I3C/I2C frames must be called in > non-atomic context. Mainly done this way to ease implementation, but > this is still open to discussion. Please let me know if you think it's > worth considering an asynchronous model here > - the bus element is a separate object and is not implicitly described > by the master (as done in I2C). The reason is that I want to be able > to handle multiple master connected to the same bus and visible to > Linux. > In this situation, we should only have one instance of the device and > not one per master, and sharing the bus object would be part of the > solution to gracefully handle this case. > I'm not sure if we will ever need to deal with multiple masters > controlling the same bus and exposed under Linux, but separating the > bus and master concept is pretty easy, hence the decision to do it > now, just in case we need it some day. > The other benefit of separating the bus and master concepts is that > master devices appear under the bus directory in sysfs. > - I2C backward compatibility has been designed to be transparent to I2C > drivers and the I2C subsystem. The I3C master just registers an I2C > adapter which creates a new I2C bus. I'd say that, from a > representation PoV it's not ideal because what should appear as a > single I3C bus exposing I3C and I2C devices here appears as 2 > different busses connected to each other through the parenting (the > I3C master is the parent of the I2C and I3C busses). > On the other hand, I don't see a better solution if we want something > that is not invasive. > > Missing features in this preliminary version: > - support for HDR modes (has been removed because of lack of real users) > - no support for multi-master and the associated concepts (mastership > handover, support for secondary masters, ...) > - I2C devices can only be described using DT because this is the only > use case I have. However, the framework can easily be extended with > ACPI and board info support > - I3C slave framework. This has been completely omitted, but shouldn't > have a huge impact on the I3C framework because I3C slaves don't see > the whole bus, it's only about handling master requests and generating > IBIs. Some of the struct, constant and enum definitions could be > shared, but most of the I3C slave framework logic will be different > > Main changes between v2 and v3 are: > - Reworked the DT bindings as suggested by Rob > - Reworked the bus initialization step as suggested by Vitor > - Added a driver for an I3C GPIO expander > > Main changes between the initial RFC and this v2 are: > - Add a generic infrastructure to support IBIs. It's worth mentioning > that I tried exposing IBIs as a regular IRQs, but after several > attempts and a discussion with Mark Zyngier, it appeared that it was > not really fitting in the Linux IRQ model (the fact that you have > payload attached to IBIs, the fact that most of the time an IBI will > generate a transfer on the bus which has to be done in an atomic > context, ...) > The counterpart of this decision is the latency induced by the > workqueue approach, but since I don't have real use cases, I don't > know if this can be a problem or not. > - Add helpers to support Hot Join > - Add support for IBIs and Hot Join in Cadence I3C master driver > - Address several issues in how I was using the device model > > Note that I2C changes have been sent separately [1] this time. Other > than that, no big changes in this version, I just addressed the > comments I received from Thomas, Peter, Geert and Rob. > > Thanks, > > Boris > > [1]https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=35687 > > Boris Brezillon (10): > i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure > docs: driver-api: Add I3C documentation > i3c: Add sysfs ABI spec > dt-bindings: i3c: Document core bindings > dt-bindings: i3c: Add macros to help fill I3C/I2C device's reg > property > MAINTAINERS: Add myself as the I3C subsystem maintainer > i3c: master: Add driver for Cadence IP > dt-bindings: i3c: Document Cadence I3C master bindings > gpio: Add a driver for Cadence I3C GPIO expander > dt-bindings: gpio: Add bindings for Cadence I3C gpio expander > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-i3c | 95 ++ > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-cdns-i3c.txt | 39 + > .../devicetree/bindings/i3c/cdns,i3c-master.txt | 44 + > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/i3c.txt | 140 ++ > Documentation/driver-api/i3c/conf.py | 10 + > Documentation/driver-api/i3c/device-driver-api.rst | 7 + > Documentation/driver-api/i3c/index.rst | 9 + > Documentation/driver-api/i3c/master-driver-api.rst | 8 + > Documentation/driver-api/i3c/protocol.rst | 201 +++ > Documentation/driver-api/index.rst | 1 + > MAINTAINERS | 9 + > drivers/Kconfig | 2 + > drivers/Makefile | 2 +- > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 11 + > drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/gpio/gpio-cdns-i3c.c | 380 +++++ > drivers/i3c/Kconfig | 24 + > drivers/i3c/Makefile | 4 + > drivers/i3c/core.c | 620 +++++++ > drivers/i3c/device.c | 294 ++++ > drivers/i3c/internals.h | 28 + > drivers/i3c/master.c | 1723 ++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/i3c/master/Kconfig | 5 + > drivers/i3c/master/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/i3c/master/i3c-master-cdns.c | 1650 +++++++++++++++++++ > include/dt-bindings/i3c/i3c.h | 28 + > include/linux/i3c/ccc.h | 382 +++++ > include/linux/i3c/device.h | 305 ++++ > include/linux/i3c/master.h | 587 +++++++ > include/linux/mod_devicetable.h | 17 + > 30 files changed, 6626 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-i3c > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-cdns-i3c.txt > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/cdns,i3c-master.txt > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/i3c.txt > create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/i3c/conf.py > create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/i3c/device-driver-api.rst > create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/i3c/index.rst > create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/i3c/master-driver-api.rst > create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/i3c/protocol.rst > create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-cdns-i3c.c > create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/Makefile > create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/core.c > create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/device.c > create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/internals.h > create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/master.c > create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/master/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/master/Makefile > create mode 100644 drivers/i3c/master/i3c-master-cdns.c > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/i3c/i3c.h > create mode 100644 include/linux/i3c/ccc.h > create mode 100644 include/linux/i3c/device.h > create mode 100644 include/linux/i3c/master.h > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html