On Montag, 2. April 2018 17:04:47 CEST Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Mon 02 Apr 05:10 PDT 2018, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c > > index 495432f3341b..258fa357d946 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c > > @@ -831,11 +831,22 @@ static int msm_gpio_init(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl) > > return ret; > > } > > > > - ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(&pctrl->chip, dev_name(pctrl->dev), 0, 0, chip->ngpio); > > - if (ret) { > > - dev_err(pctrl->dev, "Failed to add pin range\n"); > > - gpiochip_remove(&pctrl->chip); > > - return ret; > > + if (!is_of_node(pctrl->dev->fwnode)) { > > Afaict this still means that if I boot this kernel with yesterday's dtb > (without gpio-ranges) I will not get any gpios. This isn't okay. Ok, fair point. I drop this chunk. > @Linus, I count 24 callers of gpiochip_add_pin_range(). Is this > suggestion reasonable? > > Can we make gpiochip_add_pin_range() check if there's already a > gpio-range and return ok in some way? Looks like Linus is currently really busy updating the gemini target (a lot of work went into it) for OpenWrt. <https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2018-April/043752.html> (Kinda funny, because I do help to maintain the apm821xx and the new ipq40xx target over there.) In any case, I implemented your suggestion and it does look reasonable. The gpiolib already uses the gpio_offset as an ID of some sorts. For now I went with a simple ID value check, but this could be extended to a range/intersection check if necessary. But then again, let's not overengineer it. Comments are welcome, I'll wait around till sometime next week before I post v3. Regards, Christian --- diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index d66de67ef307..21c0f88e1159 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -2013,6 +2013,19 @@ int gpiochip_generic_config(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_generic_config); +static struct gpio_pin_range *gpiochip_find_by_id(struct gpio_chip *chip, + unsigned int id) +{ + struct gpio_pin_range *pin_range; + struct gpio_device *gdev = chip->gpiodev; + + list_for_each_entry(pin_range, &gdev->pin_ranges, node) { + if (pin_range->range.id == id) + return pin_range; + } + return NULL; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL /** @@ -2030,6 +2043,20 @@ int gpiochip_add_pingroup_range(struct gpio_chip *chip, struct gpio_device *gdev = chip->gpiodev; int ret; + /* + * look if a GPIO range with the same ID has already been registered. + * For pinctrls that are set up through devicetree, the GPIO Range + * might be already set by the the gpio-ranges property. + * (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt) + */ + pin_range = gpiochip_find_by_id(chip, gpio_offset); + if (pin_range) { + chip_dbg(chip, "found existing GPIO range %d->%d - skipping\n", + gpio_offset, + gpio_offset + pin_range->range.npins - 1); + return 0; + } + pin_range = kzalloc(sizeof(*pin_range), GFP_KERNEL); if (!pin_range) { chip_err(chip, "failed to allocate pin ranges\n"); @@ -2083,6 +2110,20 @@ int gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip, const char *pinctl_name, struct gpio_device *gdev = chip->gpiodev; int ret; + /* + * look if a GPIO range with the same ID has already been registered. + * For pinctrls that are set up through devicetree, the GPIO Range + * might be already set by the the gpio-ranges property. + * (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt) + */ + pin_range = gpiochip_find_by_id(chip, gpio_offset); + if (pin_range) { + chip_dbg(chip, "found existing GPIO range %d->%d - skipping\n", + gpio_offset, + gpio_offset + pin_range->range.npins - 1); + return 0; + } + pin_range = kzalloc(sizeof(*pin_range), GFP_KERNEL); if (!pin_range) { chip_err(chip, "failed to allocate pin ranges\n"); --- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html