Hi Mani, Am 03.04.2018 um 19:00 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 12:16:49AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam >> <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> +static const struct pinconf_ops owl_pinconf_ops = { >>> + .is_generic = true, >>> + .pin_config_get = owl_pin_config_get, >>> + .pin_config_set = owl_pin_config_set, >>> + .pin_config_group_get = owl_group_config_get, >>> + .pin_config_group_set = owl_group_config_set >> >> It's still good idea to leave comma here... >> > > I'm confused. What is the criteria for removing/keeping comma for last member > of struct? I followed your gpio driver suggestion. No comma for list terminator ("{}") because nothing goes after it; comma whenever it allows adding a new line without touching the old one, i.e. keeping future diff small. Cheers, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html