RE: [ANNOUNCE] libgpiod v1.0

[SZ Lin (林上智) <SZ.Lin@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Thank you for your great efforts! 

By the way, the tarball in [1] is not consistence with [2]. For example, the Doxyfile file is not existed in [1] but in [2] and m4 folder is existed in [1] but not in [2].
Would you please have a look at this?


[1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/libs/libgpiod/libgpiod-1.0.tar.gz
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libgpiod/libgpiod.git/tag/?h=v1.0

Best regards, 

SZ Lin



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski [mailto:brgl@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 11:52 PM
> To: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: SZ Lin (林上智) <SZ.Lin@xxxxxxxx>; Clemens Gruber
> <clemens.gruber@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] libgpiod v1.0
> 
> libgpiod v1.0 has been released and is available at kernel.org[1][2].
> 
> I eventually decided to keep struct timespec in the public API as I will probably not use
> ctypes for python bindings anyway since there are more structures in there that would
> require careful mapping on different architectures. Instead I'll go with hand crafting C
> extension modules. It is also always possible to add new routines which would use a
> different timestamp format.
> 
> I've included other remarks from recent reviews.
> 
> A brief summary of changes since 0.3.2 is available in the NEWS file.
> As mentioned previously: this is a major release and the public interface is not comaptible
> with the 0.x.y series. The command-line tools however work pretty much the same.
> 
> Best regards,
> Bartosz Golaszewski
> 
> [1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/libs/libgpiod/
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libgpiod/libgpiod.git/
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��
b���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f