On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There is no matching call to pinctrl_unregister, so switch to the
> managed devm_pinctrl_register to clean up properly when done.
>
> Fixes: 9e80f9064e73 ("pinctrl: Add SX150X GPIO Extender Pinctrl Driver")
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: sx150x: unregister the pinctrl on release
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: sx150x: unregister the pinctrl on release
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:53:36 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20180117133423.4482-2-peda@axentia.se>
- References: <CACRpkdZ8JYoY4nJe8n8zDaY2Lcu3BRPRpzxkv=v4FC7T2zYdiA@mail.gmail.com> <20180117133423.4482-1-peda@axentia.se> <20180117133423.4482-2-peda@axentia.se>
- References:
- Re: [REGRESSION] mux/gpio.c is not able to get any gpio pins
- From: Linus Walleij
- [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: sx150x: fixes for the probe
- From: Peter Rosin
- [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: sx150x: unregister the pinctrl on release
- From: Peter Rosin
- Re: [REGRESSION] mux/gpio.c is not able to get any gpio pins
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -next] pinctrl: ingenic: remove redundant dev_err call in ingenic_pinctrl_probe()
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: add consumer variant for gpio request
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: sx150x: unregister the pinctrl on release
- Next by thread: [PATCH] gpio: of: Fix NPE from OF flags
- Index(es):
 |