Re: [PATCH v3] gpio: of: Support SPI nonstandard GPIO properties

[Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Before it was clearly established that all GPIO properties in the
> device tree shall be named "foo-gpios" (with the deprecated variant
> "foo-gpio" for single lines) we unfortunately merged a few bindings
> which named the lines "gpio-foo" instead.
>
> This is most prominent in the GPIO SPI driver in Linux which names
> the lines "gpio-sck", "gpio-mosi" and "gpio-miso".
>
> As we want to switch the GPIO SPI driver to using descriptors, we
> need devm_gpiod_get() to return something reasonable when looking
> up these in the device tree.
>
> Put in a special #ifdef:ed kludge to do this special lookup only
> for the SPI case and gets compiled out if we're not enabling SPI.
> If we have more oddly defined legacy GPIOs like this, they can be
> handled in a similar manner.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> ChangeLog v2->v3:
> - Put the if(!IS_ENABLED()) inside the SPI GPIO retrieveal function
>   and rely on the compiler to stub out unused code.
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - Us if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPI_MASTER) instead of
>   #ifdef CONFIG_SPI_MASTER
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html