[PATCH] gpio: label descriptors using the device name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Some GPIO lines appear named "?" in the lsgpio dump due to their
requesting drivers not passing a reasonable label.

Most typically this happens if a device tree node just defines
gpios = <...> and not foo-gpios = <...>, the former gets named
"foo" and the latter gets named "?".

However the struct device passed in is always valid so let's
just label the GPIO with dev_name() on the device if no proper
label was passed.

Cc: Reported-by: Jason Kridner <jkridner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Jason Kridner <jkridner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Jason: would be great if you can test this and check if it gives
you reasonable consumer names.
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 7dde703b6da2..986293143068 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -3650,7 +3650,8 @@ struct gpio_desc *__must_check gpiod_get_index(struct device *dev,
 		return desc;
 	}
 
-	status = gpiod_request(desc, con_id);
+	/* If a connection label was passed use that, else use the device name as label */
+	status = gpiod_request(desc, con_id ? con_id : dev_name(dev));
 	if (status < 0)
 		return ERR_PTR(status);
 
-- 
2.14.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux