Re: [PATCH 3/3] [v6] pinctrl: qcom: qdf2xxx: add support for new ACPI HID QCOM8002

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 09:46 -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 12/21/2017 07:46 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > 
> > Maybe future HIDs could follow the DT design and then we can look
> > for the same device property name in both firmwares. 
> 
> DSDs generally don't have the vendor prefix that DT properties do.

There are more means to check hardware revisions:
HID - Hardware ID
CID - Compatible ID
UID - Unique ID (good to distinguish instances of the same device on the
board)
_HRV - Hardware Revision (6.1.6 describes this one)

Everything is described in the spec. Does anybody care to read?

P.S. More I reading this thread more I become thinking that people screw
ACPI use in many ways...

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html