Hi Baruch, additionally the my comments on Michael's patches in March 2017, some new below. > Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> hat am 2. Januar 2018 um 14:19 geschrieben: > > > From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Pi3 and Compute Module 3 have a GPIO expander that the > VPU communicates with. > There is a mailbox service that now allows control of this > expander, so add a kernel driver that can make use of it. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 7 ++ > drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-exp.c | 254 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 262 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-exp.c > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > index d6a8e851ad13..e2aab64ea772 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > @@ -128,6 +128,13 @@ config GPIO_AXP209 > help > Say yes to enable GPIO support for the AXP209 PMIC > > +config GPIO_BCM_EXP > + bool "Broadcom Exp GPIO" same as in the binding, i don't think this is specific to Broadcom. > + depends on OF_GPIO && RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE && (ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST) This is too long. Please split up. > + help > + Turn on GPIO support for Broadcom chips using the firmware mailbox > + to communicate with VideoCore on BCM283x chips. > + > config GPIO_BCM_KONA > bool "Broadcom Kona GPIO" > depends on OF_GPIO && (ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || COMPILE_TEST) > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile > index 4bc24febb889..c5f481b1d53c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ARIZONA) += gpio-arizona.o > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ATH79) += gpio-ath79.o > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ASPEED) += gpio-aspeed.o > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_AXP209) += gpio-axp209.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BCM_EXP) += gpio-bcm-exp.o > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BCM_KONA) += gpio-bcm-kona.o > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BD9571MWV) += gpio-bd9571mwv.o > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BRCMSTB) += gpio-brcmstb.o > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-exp.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-exp.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..d68adafaee4a > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-exp.c > @@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ > +/* > + * Broadcom expander GPIO driver > + * > + * Uses the firmware mailbox service to communicate with the > + * GPIO expander on the VPU. > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Raspberry Pi Trading Ltd. > + * > + * Author: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > + * Based on gpio-bcm-virt.c by Dom Cobley <popcornmix@xxxxxxxxx> > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > + * (at your option) any later version. > + */ SPDX identifier? > + > +#include <linux/err.h> > +#include <linux/gpio.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h> > +#include <soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h> > + > +#define MODULE_NAME "brcmexp-gpio" > +#define NUM_GPIO 8 > + > +struct brcmexp_gpio { > + struct gpio_chip gc; > + struct device *dev; > + struct rpi_firmware *fw; > +}; > + > +struct gpio_set_config { > + u32 gpio, direction, polarity, term_en, term_pull_up, state; > +}; > + > +struct gpio_get_config { > + u32 gpio, direction, polarity, term_en, term_pull_up; > +}; > + > +struct gpio_get_set_state { > + u32 gpio, state; > +}; > + > +static int brcmexp_gpio_get_polarity(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off) > +{ > + struct brcmexp_gpio *gpio; > + struct gpio_get_config get; > + int ret; > + > + gpio = container_of(gc, struct brcmexp_gpio, gc); > + > + get.gpio = off + gpio->gc.base; /* GPIO to update */ Please don't misuse the gpiochip base to communicate with the firmware. AFAIK the gc.base should be -1 (dynamic), so better use a define for the base. > + > + ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_CONFIG, > + &get, sizeof(get)); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(gpio->dev, > + "Failed to get GPIO %u config (%d)\n", off, ret); > + return ret; > + } Shouldn't we also check the in-bound status at get.gpio? And in all the other gpio ops? > ... > + > +static int brcmexp_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + int err = 0; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > + struct device_node *fw_node; > + struct rpi_firmware *fw; > + struct brcmexp_gpio *ucb; > + > + fw_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "firmware", 0); > + if (!fw_node) { > + dev_err(dev, "Missing firmware node\n"); > + return -ENOENT; > + } > + > + fw = rpi_firmware_get(fw_node); > + if (!fw) > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > + > + ucb = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ucb), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!ucb) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + ucb->fw = fw; > + ucb->dev = dev; > + ucb->gc.label = MODULE_NAME; > + ucb->gc.owner = THIS_MODULE; > + ucb->gc.of_node = np; > + ucb->gc.base = 128; As said above this should be -1 Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html