On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The fix restores a proper validation of an input gpio desc, which
> might be needed to deal with optional GPIOs correctly.
>
> Fixes: 02e479808b5d ("gpio: Alter semantics of *raw* operations to actually be raw")
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@xxxxxxxxx>
Hm you're right this looks better.
I don't think it's a regression so queued as a non-critical fix.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: don't dereference a desc before validation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: don't dereference a desc before validation
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 09:32:17 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20171221163724.6043-1-vz@mleia.com>
- References: <20171221163724.6043-1-vz@mleia.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] gpiolib: don't dereference a desc before validation
- From: Vladimir Zapolskiy
- [PATCH] gpiolib: don't dereference a desc before validation
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: baytrail: Enable glitch filter for GPIOs used as interrupts
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: remove a redundant check in gpiod_to_chip()
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] gpiolib: don't dereference a desc before validation
- Next by thread: [PATCH] gpiolib: remove a redundant check in gpiod_to_chip()
- Index(es):
 |