On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Seems helpful. Patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] gpio: mark expected switch fall-throughs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:58:47 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20171013204353.GA27362@embeddedor.com>
- References: <20171013204353.GA27362@embeddedor.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
- [PATCH] gpio: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] pinctrl: dt-bindings: Fix A37xx uart2 group name
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] pinctrl: meson: separate soc drivers
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] gpio: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- Next by thread: [PATCH] pinctrl: gemini: Add missing functions
- Index(es):
 |