On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hence, the last user of irq_base field was removed by commit b4c495f03ae3
> ("gpio: mockup: use irq_sim") it can be removed safely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
Patch applied. Let's see what the build servers say.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: drop irq_base field from gpio_chip struct
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: drop irq_base field from gpio_chip struct
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:22:35 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20171009221605.19108-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
- References: <20171009221605.19108-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] gpiolib: drop irq_base field from gpio_chip struct
- From: Grygorii Strashko
- [PATCH] gpiolib: drop irq_base field from gpio_chip struct
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pinctrl: mcp23s08: remove unused variables from pinconf_set
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: Update GPIO EN_CTL when setting pin config
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] gpiolib: drop irq_base field from gpio_chip struct
- Next by thread: [PATCH] gpio: gpio-dwapb: add optional reset
- Index(es):
 |