On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The function ingenic_pinctrl_probe is local to the source and does > not need to be in global scope, so make it static. > > Cleans up sparse warnings > symbol 'ingenic_pinctrl_probe' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: ingenic: make function ingenic_pinctrl_probe static
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: ingenic: make function ingenic_pinctrl_probe static
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 23:02:22 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20171005101137.29664-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
- References: <20171005101137.29664-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] pinctrl: ingenic: make function ingenic_pinctrl_probe static
- From: Colin King
- [PATCH] pinctrl: ingenic: make function ingenic_pinctrl_probe static
- Prev by Date: [PATCH v2 1/3] pinctrl: sunxi: Introduce the strict flag
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sx150x: make struct sx150x_regmap_config static
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] pinctrl: ingenic: make function ingenic_pinctrl_probe static
- Next by thread: [PATCH] pinctrl: sx150x: make struct sx150x_regmap_config static
- Index(es):
 |