[PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: Allow indicating loss of state across suspend/resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Linus,

It's me again, so I have been thinking about the problem originally
reported in: [PATCH fixes v3] pinctrl: Really force states during suspend/resume

and other similar patches a while ago, and this new version allows a platform
using pinctrl-single to specify whether its pins are going to lose their state
during a system deep sleep.

Note that this is still checked at the pinctrl_select_state() because consumers
of the pinctrl API might be calling this from their suspend/resume functions
and should not have to know whether the provider does lose its pin states.

Thanks!

Florian Fainelli (2):
  pinctrl: Allow a device to indicate when to force a state
  pinctrl: single: Allow indicating loss of pin states during low-power

 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.txt        |  4 ++++
 drivers/pinctrl/core.c                                    | 15 +++++++++++++++
 drivers/pinctrl/core.h                                    |  4 ++++
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c                          |  3 +++
 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+)

-- 
2.14.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux