On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 10:23 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 14:52 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Yong Li <sdliyong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On AST2500, the hardware strap register(SCU70) only accepts write ‘1’, > > > > to clear it to ‘0’, must set bits(write ‘1’) to SCU7C > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yong Li <sdliyong@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Patch applied with Andrew's review/test tags. > > > > I realised after I sent the tags on v3 that I'd made a mistake: There's a > > slightly awkward to test bug in the v3 implementation. I followed up on v3 with > > this: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/16/905 > > > > And Yong sent out a corresponding v4: > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/802946/ > > Ah. I got confused and picked the wrong version. Entirely my fault. Apologies again for the confusion. I owe you a few drinks if we ever meet :) > > > I see you've pushed Yong's v3 in pinctrl/devel - can we revert/remove that and > > apply v4? > > No I would have to revert the patch. > > Can't we simply make a small fixup patch? I couldn't recall what the rebase policy was for pinctrl/devel. I have sent the fixup patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/804981/ Cheers, Andrew > > Yours, > Linus Walleij
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
