On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven > <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Magnus reported that on sh7722/Migo-R, pinctrl registration fails with: >> >> sh-pfc pfc-sh7722: pin 0 already registered >> sh-pfc pfc-sh7722: error during pin registration >> sh-pfc pfc-sh7722: could not register: -22 >> sh-pfc: probe of pfc-sh7722 failed with error -22 >> >> pinmux_pins[] is initialized through PINMUX_GPIO(), using designated >> array initializers, where the GPIO_* enums serve as indices. >> Apparently GPIO_PTQ7 was defined in the enum, but never used. >> If enum values are defined, but never used, pinmux_pins[] contains >> (zero-filled) holes. Hence such entries are treated as pin zero, which >> was registered before, and pinctrl registration fails. >> >> I can't see how this ever worked, as at the time of commit f5e25ae52feff2dc >> ("sh-pfc: Add sh7722 pinmux support"), pinmux_gpios[] in >> drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-sh7722.c already had the hole, and >> drivers/pinctrl/core.c already had the check. >> >> Some scripting revealed a few more broken drivers: >> - sh7757 has four holes, due to nonexistent GPIO_PT[JLNQ]7_RESV. >> - sh7264 and sh7269 define GPIO_PH[0-7], but don't use it with >> PINMUX_GPIO(). >> >> Patch 1 fixes the issue on sh7722, and was tested. >> Patches 3-4 should fix the issue on the other 3 SoCs, but was untested due >> to lack of hardware. >> >> Changes compared to v1: >> - Replace fake error messages by references to sh7722, >> - Add Reviewed-by, Tested-by. >> >> Thanks for applying! >> >> Geert Uytterhoeven (4): >> sh: sh7722: Remove nonexistent GPIO_PTQ7 to fix pinctrl registration >> sh: sh7757: Remove nonexistent GPIO_PT[JLNQ]7_RESV to fix pinctrl >> registration >> sh: sh7264: Remove nonexistent GPIO_PH[0-7] to fix pinctrl >> registration >> sh: sh7269: Remove nonexistent GPIO_PH[0-7] to fix pinctrl >> registration >> >> arch/sh/include/cpu-sh2a/cpu/sh7264.h | 4 +--- >> arch/sh/include/cpu-sh2a/cpu/sh7269.h | 4 +--- >> arch/sh/include/cpu-sh4/cpu/sh7722.h | 2 +- >> arch/sh/include/cpu-sh4/cpu/sh7757.h | 8 ++++---- >> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > Are these patches planned for inclusion in v4.13? > I don't see them in next-2016. In v4.14, perhaps? I don't see them in next-20170811... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html