On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In header files, static inline is more commonly used. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Good point. Patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] gpio: replace __maybe_unused in gpiolib.h with static inline
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: replace __maybe_unused in gpiolib.h with static inline
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 09:55:50 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1499784103-1538-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
- References: <1499784103-1538-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio: replace __maybe_unused in gpiolib.h with static inline
- From: Masahiro Yamada
- [PATCH] gpio: replace __maybe_unused in gpiolib.h with static inline
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpio: drop unnecessary includes from include/linux/gpio/driver.h
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: rza1: constify gpio_chip structure
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] gpio: replace __maybe_unused in gpiolib.h with static inline
- Next by thread: Should irq_enable/disable be flagging/unflagging gpio lines used as irq?
- Index(es):
 |