On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 14:31 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > WARN_ON causes a backtrace to get logged which is only useful for > kernel bugs. For signalling a firmware bug dev_warn(dev, FW_BUG "...") > should be used. > > This fixes users running userspace software to monitor kernel oopses > getting a false positive bug-report every boot because of the wrong > use of WARN_ON. I'm not against the patch, looks good to me, though can you shed a bit of light what is the FW bug you are experiencing? > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c > b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c > index fa3c5758ac67..0f3a02495aeb 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c > @@ -981,12 +981,12 @@ static int byt_gpio_request_enable(struct > pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev, > */ > value = readl(reg) & BYT_PIN_MUX; > gpio_mux = byt_get_gpio_mux(vg, offset); > - if (WARN_ON(gpio_mux != value)) { > + if (gpio_mux != value) { > value = readl(reg) & ~BYT_PIN_MUX; > value |= gpio_mux; > writel(value, reg); > > - dev_warn(&vg->pdev->dev, > + dev_warn(&vg->pdev->dev, FW_BUG > "pin %u forcibly re-configured as GPIO\n", > offset); > } > -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html