On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Brian Norris wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 03:06:26PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > That said, the commit should be reverted and the issue needs to analyzed > > proper. We still need the RCU -> SCRU conversion, but that's a different > > problem. > > Can we consider this an "ack" for the $subject then? Heiko also gave his > approval. How can this get merged? It's running a bit late for 4.12, > though it really shouldn't be risky (at least for non-RT stuff that was > working warning-free already in 4.11), but a 4.13-rc1 with -stable tag > could work as well. Yes. That revert can go into 4.12 from my POV, but I leave that to Linus. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH for 4.12] Revert "pinctrl: rockchip: avoid hardirq-unsafe functions in irq_chip"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH for 4.12] Revert "pinctrl: rockchip: avoid hardirq-unsafe functions in irq_chip"
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 20:07:25 +0200 (CEST)
- In-reply-to: <20170627172306.GA91202@google.com>
- References: <20170517225634.GA11404@google.com> <20170527021900.GA119873@google.com> <20170623205911.GA143883@google.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706232353220.2234@nanos> <20170627000622.GA63039@google.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706271357520.1798@nanos> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706271504521.1798@nanos> <20170627172306.GA91202@google.com>
- User-agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
- References:
- [4.12 REGRESSION] pinctrl: rockchip: sleeping function called from atomic context
- From: Brian Norris
- Re: [4.12 REGRESSION] pinctrl: rockchip: sleeping function called from atomic context
- From: Brian Norris
- [PATCH for 4.12] Revert "pinctrl: rockchip: avoid hardirq-unsafe functions in irq_chip"
- From: Brian Norris
- Re: [PATCH for 4.12] Revert "pinctrl: rockchip: avoid hardirq-unsafe functions in irq_chip"
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: [PATCH for 4.12] Revert "pinctrl: rockchip: avoid hardirq-unsafe functions in irq_chip"
- From: Brian Norris
- Re: [PATCH for 4.12] Revert "pinctrl: rockchip: avoid hardirq-unsafe functions in irq_chip"
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: [PATCH for 4.12] Revert "pinctrl: rockchip: avoid hardirq-unsafe functions in irq_chip"
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: [PATCH for 4.12] Revert "pinctrl: rockchip: avoid hardirq-unsafe functions in irq_chip"
- From: Brian Norris
- [4.12 REGRESSION] pinctrl: rockchip: sleeping function called from atomic context
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] gpio: about the need to manage irq mapping dynamically.
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] gpio: about the need to manage irq mapping dynamically.
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH for 4.12] Revert "pinctrl: rockchip: avoid hardirq-unsafe functions in irq_chip"
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH for 4.12] Revert "pinctrl: rockchip: avoid hardirq-unsafe functions in irq_chip"
- Index(es):
 |