On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:22:05AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > If the interrupt _IS_ screaming because the hardware is buggered, then the > nobody cared thing will detect it and switch it off. That's all what we can > do, aside of not loading the driver at all. > > But that's way better than silently locking up the box forever. Sounds to me we should route this fix to stable. Looking at Linus' branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/commit/?h=fixes&id=ba714a9c1dea85e0bf2899d02dfeb9c70040427c patch isn't tagged for stable. Should it be? It certainly is an improvement of the situation. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:29:33 +0200
- In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706201120190.1869@nanos>
- References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1705232307330.2409@nanos> <BLUPR12MB07212D4797B68DB06C3A6D40A0FC0@BLUPR12MB0721.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1705260841250.1902@nanos> <BLUPR12MB0721B0824892B985DC807471A0FC0@BLUPR12MB0721.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> <20170619161323.pjdrh6l33pqix32x@pd.tnic> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706201120190.1869@nanos>
- User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
- References:
- [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- RE: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
- From: Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra
- RE: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- RE: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
- From: Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
- From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: ingenic: checking for NULL instead of IS_ERR()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: samsung: Consistently use unsigned instead of u32 for nr_banks
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
- Index(es):
 |