Re: [RFC PATCH] gpio: use "output-active" and "output-inactive" for gpio-hogs

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  - input:      A property specifying to set the GPIO direction as input.
> -- output-low  A property specifying to set the GPIO direction as output with
> -             the value low.
> -- output-high A property specifying to set the GPIO direction as output with
> -             the value high.
> +- output-inactive: A property specifying to set the GPIO direction as output
> +             using the inactive level as value.
> +- output-active: A property specifying to set the GPIO direction as output
> +             using the active level as value.
> +- output-low  A deprecated alias for "output-inactive".
> +- output-high A deprecated alias for "output-active".

Wouldn't "output-asserted" / "output-deasserted" be more to the point?

If the majority prefers "active" I can live with that too.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html