On Tue, 30 May 2017 17:35:33 +0200 Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Ralph, > > I have the functional spec (no NDA needed, but it's not the full > one) : A38x-Functional-Spec-PU0A.pdf > https://marvellcorp.wufoo.com/forms/marvell-armada-38x-functional-specifications/ > (just an email needed, no blood signing nor chicken slaughtering) > There are the GPIO Blink Counter A/B is ON/OFF Duration Registers as > well as the Blink Enable Registers. > Hi Richard, Thanks for the link, as the terms only talk about materials obtained from www.marvell.com this one from wufoo.com should be exempt ;) Also at a glance looks like the complete one. Also says "Functional Specifications – Unrestricted". Maybe you want to re-download it. Regardless, as you said the blinking registers are all described. So it's probably safe to assume 39x will have them as well. > I've done a pwm with different periods (8ms, 4ms, 100ns). > Looking at the scope, it seems to work pretty well :) > > >> > >> And it makes me realized that I missed the bad naming of the > >> compatible string. We don't use family name for the compatible > >> string, but the name of the first SoC compatible with. So in this > >> case we should use "marvell,armada-370", as it is still in rc and > >> not yet deployed. What about fixing the name now? Gregory, Knowing it's not limited to 370/XP makes "marvell,armada-370-gpio" an obviously better choice for the compatible string. Guess you didn't mean to drop the "-gpio" suffix. Will work on a patch changing the compatible string / documentation for 4.12 and an updated patch for armada 370/XP dtsi as well as a patch adding the properties to 38x for 4.13+. Expect them tomorrow, probably won't get around to it today anymore. Ralph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html