On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On the SIMATIC, IOT2040 only a single pin is exportable as GPIO, the > rest is required to operate the UART. To allow modeling this case, > expand the platform device data structure to specify a (consecutive) pin > subset for exporting by the gpio-exar driver. > + unsigned int first_pin; > + if (device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "first_pin", &first_pin) < 0 || And again, we need to follow the rules of the device property bindings. (No underscores - use dashes; name should be registered). Without Rafael's / Mika's and Rob's opinions I would not go with a such name even for internal property. DWC3 (USB) for example is still using "linux," prefix. I dunno if it's the case here, I mean can or can't we use similar approach. > + device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "npins", &npins) < 0) "ngpios" -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html