Hi Laurent, On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday 24 May 2017 13:43:34 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Configuration of the lcd0 pinmux group and GPIO hog for the external >> GPIO mux are done using a single device node, causing the "output-high" >> property to be applied to both. This will fail for the pinmux group, >> but doesn't cause any harm, as the failure is ignored silently. >> >> However, after "pinctrl: sh-pfc: propagate errors on group config", the >> failure will become fatal, leading to a broken display: >> >> sh-pfc e6050000.pin-controller: pin_config_group_set op failed for group >> 102 sh-pfc e6050000.pin-controller: Error applying setting, reverse things >> back sh-pfc e6050000.pin-controller: failed to select default state >> >> Split the configuration in two subnodes, and replace the GPIO hog by a >> pull-up pin bias to fix this. >> >> Fixes: ffd2f9a5afb730b9 ("ARM: shmobile: armadillo800eva dts: Add pinctrl >> and gpio-hog for lcdc0") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven >> <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> This is a hard dependency for "pinctrl: sh-pfc: propagate errors on >> group config" (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9186713/). >> >> Notes: >> 1. Just keeping the GPIO hog doesn't work, as the sh-pfc driver >> requires each pinctrl (sub)node to have at least one "pins" or >> "groups" property, >> 2. Keeping "output-high" doesn't work, as the sh-pfc driver does not >> implement PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT. >> >> Should I fix 1 and/or 2 instead? >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740-armadillo800eva.dts | 15 +++++++++------ >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740-armadillo800eva.dts >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740-armadillo800eva.dts index >> 44b335b9f035436d..7feedc86f6915654 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740-armadillo800eva.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740-armadillo800eva.dts >> @@ -267,13 +267,16 @@ >> }; >> >> lcd0_pins: lcd0 { >> - groups = "lcd0_data24_0", "lcd0_lclk_1", "lcd0_sync"; >> - function = "lcd0"; >> + mux { >> + groups = "lcd0_data24_0", "lcd0_lclk_1", "lcd0_sync"; >> + function = "lcd0"; >> + }; >> >> - /* DBGMD/LCDC0/FSIA MUX */ >> - gpio-hog; >> - gpios = <176 0>; >> - output-high; >> + gpio { >> + /* DBGMD/LCDC0/FSIA MUX */ >> + pins = "PORT176"; >> + bias-pull-up; > > The signal is pulled low through a 10kΩ resistor, so a pull-up is a bit weak. According to the schematics, the resistor is not mounted. > You'll end up with an intermediate voltage level that could result in meta- > stability and/or latch-up. I think we need to really drive the output to 1. Agreed. Better safe than sorry. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html