Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: gpio-vf610: add imx7ulp support

[Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx>]

On 2017-05-14 23:28, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> The Rapid General-Purpose Input and Output with 2 Ports (RGPIO2P)
> on MX7ULP is similar to GPIO on Vibrid. But unlike Vibrid, the
> RGPIO2P has an extra Port Data Direction Register (PDDR) used
> to configure the individual port pins for input or output.
> 
> We introduce a FSL_GPIO_HAVE_PDDR with fsl_gpio_soc_data data
> to distinguish this differences. And we support getting the output
> status by checking the GPIO direction in PDDR.
> 
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
> index 521fbe3..a439d27 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
> @@ -30,10 +30,15 @@
>  
>  #define VF610_GPIO_PER_PORT		32
>  
> +struct fsl_gpio_soc_data {
> +	u32 flags;
> +};
> +
>  struct vf610_gpio_port {
>  	struct gpio_chip gc;
>  	void __iomem *base;
>  	void __iomem *gpio_base;
> +	const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data *sdata;
>  	u8 irqc[VF610_GPIO_PER_PORT];
>  	int irq;
>  };
> @@ -43,6 +48,7 @@ struct vf610_gpio_port {
>  #define GPIO_PCOR		0x08
>  #define GPIO_PTOR		0x0c
>  #define GPIO_PDIR		0x10
> +#define GPIO_PDDR		0x14
>  
>  #define PORT_PCR(n)		((n) * 0x4)
>  #define PORT_PCR_IRQC_OFFSET	16
> @@ -59,10 +65,18 @@ struct vf610_gpio_port {
>  #define PORT_INT_EITHER_EDGE	0xb
>  #define PORT_INT_LOGIC_ONE	0xc
>  
> +/* SoC has a Port Data Direction Register (PDDR) */
> +#define FSL_GPIO_HAVE_PDDR	BIT(0)
> +
>  static struct irq_chip vf610_gpio_irq_chip;
>  
> +static const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data imx_data = {
> +	.flags = FSL_GPIO_HAVE_PDDR,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct of_device_id vf610_gpio_dt_ids[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,vf610-gpio" },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,vf610-gpio",	.data = NULL, },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-gpio",	.data = &imx_data, },
>  	{ /* sentinel */ }
>  };
>  
> @@ -79,8 +93,18 @@ static inline u32 vf610_gpio_readl(void __iomem *reg)
>  static int vf610_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
>  {
>  	struct vf610_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> -
> -	return !!(vf610_gpio_readl(port->gpio_base + GPIO_PDIR) & BIT(gpio));
> +	unsigned long mask = BIT(gpio);
> +	void __iomem *addr;
> +
> +	if (port->sdata && port->sdata->flags & FSL_GPIO_HAVE_PDDR) {
> +		mask &= vf610_gpio_readl(port->gpio_base + GPIO_PDDR);
> +		addr = mask ? port->gpio_base + GPIO_PDOR :
> +			      port->gpio_base + GPIO_PDIR;
> +		return !!(vf610_gpio_readl(addr) & BIT(gpio));
> +	} else {
> +		return !!(vf610_gpio_readl(port->gpio_base + GPIO_PDIR)
> +					   & BIT(gpio));
> +	}

I would rather prefer to read the actual value on the wire...

>  }
>  
>  static void vf610_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
> @@ -96,12 +120,28 @@ static void vf610_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> unsigned int gpio, int val)
>  
>  static int vf610_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
>  {
> +	struct vf610_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +	unsigned long mask = BIT(gpio);
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	if (port->sdata && port->sdata->flags & FSL_GPIO_HAVE_PDDR) {
> +		val = vf610_gpio_readl(port->gpio_base + GPIO_PDDR);
> +		val &= ~mask;
> +		vf610_gpio_writel(val, port->gpio_base + GPIO_PDDR);

As mentioned in the pinctrl patchset review, if we can do this
orthogonal, I would rather prefer to not involve pinctrl here in the
i.MX 7ULP case. So I would make sure that
pinctrl_gpio_direction_input/output does not get called at all (e.g.
returning in this if case)...

--
Stefan

> +	}
> +
>  	return pinctrl_gpio_direction_input(chip->base + gpio);
>  }
>  
>  static int vf610_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio,
>  				       int value)
>  {
> +	struct vf610_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +	unsigned long mask = BIT(gpio);
> +
> +	if (port->sdata && port->sdata->flags & FSL_GPIO_HAVE_PDDR)
> +		vf610_gpio_writel(mask, port->gpio_base + GPIO_PDDR);
> +
>  	vf610_gpio_set(chip, gpio, value);
>  
>  	return pinctrl_gpio_direction_output(chip->base + gpio);
> @@ -216,6 +256,8 @@ static struct irq_chip vf610_gpio_irq_chip = {
>  
>  static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> +	const struct of_device_id *of_id = of_match_device(vf610_gpio_dt_ids,
> +							   &pdev->dev);
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>  	struct vf610_gpio_port *port;
> @@ -227,6 +269,7 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!port)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	port->sdata = of_id->data;
>  	iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>  	port->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, iores);
>  	if (IS_ERR(port->base))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html