Am 12.05.2017 um 21:38 schrieb Rob Herring: > On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 06:34:09PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> Document the DT binding for GPIO IRQ support on Amlogic Meson SoC's. >> >> This documentation is intentionally not placed under >> interrupt-controllers as GPIO IRQ support on these SoC's acts more >> like an interrupt multiplexer. >> >> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../bindings/gpio/amlogic,meson-gpio-interrupt.txt | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Seems more like an irqchip? > It is an irq_chip. Would you therefore prefer a different name or another location for this binding documentation? >> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/amlogic,meson-gpio-interrupt.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/amlogic,meson-gpio-interrupt.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/amlogic,meson-gpio-interrupt.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..35a052b8 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/amlogic,meson-gpio-interrupt.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ >> +Amlogic meson GPIO interrupt controller >> + >> +Meson SoCs contains an interrupt controller which is able watch the SoC pads >> +and generate an interrupt on edges or level. The controller is essentially a >> +256 pads to 8 GIC interrupt multiplexer, with a filter block to select edge >> +or level and polarity. We don't expose all 256 mux inputs because the >> +documentation shows that upper part is not mapped to any pad. The actual number >> +of interrupt exposed depends on the SoC. >> + >> +Required properties: >> + >> +- compatible : should be "amlogic,meson-gpio-interrupt", "syscon". > > Why syscon? > Has been removed already in v2 of the patch. >> +- reg : Specifies base physical address and size of the registers. >> +- interrupts : list of GIC interrupts which can be used with the >> + GPIO IRQ multiplexer > > What about interrupt-controller property? > This HW is somewhat special, it's more or less a multiplexer between 100+ GPIO's and 8 GIC IRQ's. And we have two GPIO domains, both having a "gpio-controller". It doesn't seem that the "interrupt-controller" property is right here. I'd tend to say it should be added to the "gpio-controller" nodes. >> + >> +Example: >> + >> +gpio_irq@9880 { > > interrupt-controller@... > This relates to previous comment, as it isn't really an interrupt controller I'm not sure we should use this name. >> + compatible = "amlogic,meson-gpio-interrupt", "syscon"; >> + reg = <0x0 0x09880 0x0 0x10>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 64 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>, >> + <GIC_SPI 65 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>, >> + <GIC_SPI 66 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>, >> + <GIC_SPI 67 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>, >> + <GIC_SPI 68 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>, >> + <GIC_SPI 69 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>, >> + <GIC_SPI 70 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>, >> + <GIC_SPI 71 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>; >> + }; >> -- >> 2.12.2 >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html