On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Interrupt numbers are never negative, zero serves as the special invalid > value. > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied for devel (v4.12). The rest we need to discuss. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 01/12] gpio: Use unsigned int for interrupt numbers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] gpio: Use unsigned int for interrupt numbers
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:17:18 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20170403160532.20282-2-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
- References: <20170403160532.20282-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20170403160532.20282-2-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
- References:
- [PATCH 00/12] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration and Tegra186 support
- From: Thierry Reding
- [PATCH 01/12] gpio: Use unsigned int for interrupt numbers
- From: Thierry Reding
- [PATCH 00/12] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration and Tegra186 support
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: arizona: Add GPIO maintain state flag
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: arizona: Add GPIO maintain state flag
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 01/12] gpio: Use unsigned int for interrupt numbers
- Next by thread: [PATCH 02/12] gpio: Implement tighter IRQ chip integration
- Index(es):
 |