On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Document "pinmux" property as part of generic pin controller > documentation. > Fix 2 minor typos in documentation while at there. > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied. This is documenting what is already the case and is as such very helpful. > Sending this one as RFC to collect feedback. I just applied it. It is already much better than what we have. If more adjustments are needed, people can send additional patches. > If the change is not rejected is it > worth adding to pin controller core helper functions to parse the newly > documented property, as this commit > <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9411231/> > did for "pinctrl-pin-array" one? > > All drivers using "pinmux" exhibit the same behavior which is fine as long as > "pinmux" only accepts a list of u32 parameters. > > ... > pins = of_find_property(node, "pinmux", NULL); > ... > npins = pins->length / sizeof(u32); > ... > of_property_read_u32_index(node, "pinmux", > i, &pinfunc); > ... It makes sense. Just make sure to move users over to use the helpers. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html