Hello Geert, > From: geert.uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxx > [mailto:geert.uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven > Sent: 30 March 2017 10:11 > > Hi Chris, > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux- > m68k.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Chris Paterson > > <Chris.Paterson2@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> From: linux-renesas-soc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> [mailto:linux-renesas-soc- owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > >>> Sergei Shtylyov > >>> Sent: 29 March 2017 19:37 > >>> > >>> The R8A7791 PFC driver was apparently based on the preliminary > >>> revisions of the user's manual, which omitted the DVC_MUTE signal > >>> altogether in the PFC section. The modern manual has the signal > >>> described, so just add the necassary data to the driver... > >>> > >>> Fixes: 508845196238 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7791 PFC support") > >>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Should this patch also CC stable? (Patch 1/2 does) > > > > No need to spam stable with all these patches and reviews. > > If it has a Fixes-tag, the stable team will pick it up anyway. After > > it has ended up upstream. Okay. > > And in this case, there's not really a need to backport it to stable, as there > cannot be any users due to lack of pins using these definitions. Whereas the first patch in the series fixes a problem that *is* currently seen by users, so will need backporting. Makes sense now, thanks! Kind regards, Chris > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux- > m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�� b���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f