Hi Linus, On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:38 PM, <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> The fact that historically all the early adopters of pinctrl in device >>> tree >>> have these funky custom bindings is unfortunate but just something >>> that we need to live with. >> >> To avoid any confusion, please bear with me and clarify this once and for >> all, >> since I'm not certain I fully got you here. >> >> Are you suggesting: >> >> 1) Use "pins" property with the currently implemented ABI (which slightly >> differs >> from the standard documented one as explained above. Not sure it is fine >> overriding >> it or not) > > Correction: you should be using the property "pinmux", because you > are setting group and function at the same time. OK. > See for example: > include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h > > And how that is used in: > arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-pinfunc.h > arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts > > The docs are here: > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt65xx.txt All of the above pack the information for a pin into a single 32-bit integer. Is that what you want us to use, too? Currently we use two integers: 1) pin index, and 2) function/flags combo. > I'm sorry that "pinmux" is not part of the generic documentation, it'd be > great if you would like to add it with a patch. That would mean pinmux could be an array of single values, or tuples. Is that OK? Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html