Dear all, Thank you for your feedback! On 02/22/2017 10:04 PM, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 03:52:05PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Marc Pignat <marc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... >> Please look a bit at drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c, and gpio-f7188x.c it seems to me >> that this is a simlar or identical chip to one of these. In that case, Looking at gpio-f7188x.c is probably the best feedback. In fact the patch I proposed is just a copy+modifications of an old version of this file. So someone (who has put his name in the author field) has copied the gpio-f7188x.c, changed something like 20 lines (excluding identifiers renaming) and pushed it to github. I took it from github, tested it and passed it through checkpatch.pl and proposed it for inclusion into the mainline kernel. >> you should >> augment and extend an existing driver instead of writing a new one. Sure! >> But I haven't ... > > This plan would obviously require more time to get right, so if you > decide to merge this particular driver now, I suggest at least using the > isa_driver idioms for now to ease the transition to a possible future > super_io_driver. super_io_driver seems a good idea, in the meantime, I will try to merge the nct5104 code into gpio-f7188x.c, without the isa_driver idiom. Best regards Marc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html