Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] pinctrl: baytrail: Add missing spinlock usage in byt_gpio_irq_handler

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Alexander Stein
<alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday 30 January 2017 13:51:49, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:35:28PM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
>> > According to VLI64 Intel Atom E3800 Specification Update (#329901)
>> > concurrent read accesses may result in returning 0xffffffff and write
>> > accesses may be dropped silently.
>> > To workaround all accesses must be protected by locks.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Should probably go to stable as well.
>
> Sure, but I don't know which stable kernels this should go in.

More often than not, I *think* Greg will figure that out by:
"does it apply?" "then yes"

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html