On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/30/2017 04:19 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> + if (!of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(np, "gpio-ranges", 3, 0, >>> &args)) >>> + bank_nr = args.args[1] / STM32_GPIO_PINS_PER_BANK; >>> + else { >>> + range->name = bank->gpio_chip.label; >>> + range->id = bank_nr; >>> + range->pin_base = range->id * STM32_GPIO_PINS_PER_BANK; >>> + range->base = range->id * STM32_GPIO_PINS_PER_BANK; >>> + range->npins = npins; >>> + range->gc = &bank->gpio_chip; >>> + pinctrl_add_gpio_range(pctl->pctl_dev, >>> + &pctl->banks[bank_nr].range); >>> + } > > > I Keep the old way to get range in order to keep compatibility with older > device tree (if no gpio ranges are defined). Aha I understand. Sorry for my stupidity. Go ahead with this! Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html