Hi Jacopo, On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Add dt-bindings header for Renesas RZ pincontroller. > The header defines macros for pin description and alternate function > numbers. > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-renesas-rz.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-renesas-rz.h > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-renesas-rz.h b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-renesas-rz.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..92816d4 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-renesas-rz.h > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ > +/* > + * Defines macros and constants for Renesas RZ pin controller and muxer > + */ > + > +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_PINCTRL_RENESAS_RZ_H > +#define __DT_BINDINGS_PINCTRL_RENESAS_RZ_H > + > +#define RZ_PIN(b, p) b p And the advantage of this macro is? > +#define ALTERNATE_FUNC_1 0 > +#define ALTERNATE_FUNC_2 1 > +#define ALTERNATE_FUNC_3 2 > +#define ALTERNATE_FUNC_4 3 > +#define ALTERNATE_FUNC_5 4 > +#define ALTERNATE_FUNC_6 5 > +#define ALTERNATE_FUNC_7 6 > +#define ALTERNATE_FUNC_8 7 I have mixed feelings about these macros: 1. They're long to type, 2. They just map from n to n-1. Why not use plain numbers 1..8 (the alternate function numbering in the datasheet is 1-based), and subtract 1 in the C code? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html