Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Pad retentions support for Exynos5433

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Linus Walleij
> <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Marek Szyprowski
>> <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Patches in this patchset depends on each other. They are order in such a
>>> way to make the changes bisectable.
>>>
>>> Patch #3 has runtime dependency on #1.
>>> Patch #5 has runtime dependency on #3.
>>> Patch #6 has runtime dependency on #4.
>>>
>>> This patchset also directly depends on the "Move pad retention control to
>>> Exynos pin controller driver" patchset:
>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg556074.html
>>
>> Do we *have* to merge it runtime-bisectably?
>>
>> I'm asking because we need a huge immutable branch
>> (I guess in the MFD subsystem) to deal with that.
>
> It helps a lot with finding introduced issues, so I think yes - we
> want it runtime-bisectable. The board has already support in mainline
> so it is not theoretical runtime...

OK I just wait for an immutable branch to pull for this to work
out then.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html