On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There are no gpio-nalils, so fix label accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied! :) Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] gpio-hammer: fix make consumer_label suitable to work on gpio-nails
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio-hammer: fix make consumer_label suitable to work on gpio-nails
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:29:01 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20170125210144.26831-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
- References: <20170125210144.26831-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio-hammer: fix make consumer_label suitable to work on gpio-nails
- From: Uwe Kleine-König
- [PATCH] gpio-hammer: fix make consumer_label suitable to work on gpio-nails
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: Use real dependencies
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 REBASED 07/13] pinctrl: samsung: Add missing initconst annotation
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio-hammer: fix make consumer_label suitable to work on gpio-nails
- Next by thread: [PATCH v2 0/8] Pad retentions support for Exynos5433
- Index(es):
 |