Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] of: Pass GPIO label down to gpiod_request when using get_gpiod_from_child

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Linus,

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> -gpio-780 (?): gpiod_set_debounce: missing set() or set_debounce() operations
>> +gpio-780 (SW30): gpiod_set_debounce: missing set() or set_debounce() operations
>
> And there is a special problem.
>
> I wanted, at one point, to take the timer-based debouncing code out of
> the GPIO keys input driver and make it into a generic fallback in
> gpiolib so that *any* GPIO controller could be made to provide
> debounce.
>
> I ran into some obstacle feelin it was impossible IIRC but do not
> remember what it was.

Are these real problems? They are debug prints.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html