Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> The pinctrl-baytrail driver builds just fine as a module so give
> users this option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks okay to me.
FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> This was discussed almost one year ago, with no clear conclusion, but
> also no evidence that the driver can't be built as a module. Is there
> any way to push this forward?
>
>  drivers/pinctrl/intel/Kconfig |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-4.7-rc7.orig/drivers/pinctrl/intel/Kconfig    2016-07-12 14:35:36.024835842 +0200
> +++ linux-4.7-rc7/drivers/pinctrl/intel/Kconfig 2016-07-12 14:35:44.735904433 +0200
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>  #
>
>  config PINCTRL_BAYTRAIL
> -       bool "Intel Baytrail GPIO pin control"
> +       tristate "Intel Baytrail GPIO pin control"
>         depends on GPIOLIB && ACPI
>         select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
>         select PINMUX
>
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
> SUSE L3 Support



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html