On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> wrote: > The Davinci GPIO driver is implemented to work with one monolithic > Davinci GPIO platform device which may have up to Y(144) gpios. I'm a bit confused by the different DaVinci series since there seem to be different series floating and I don't know what order to apply them, it fails for me. Can you: - Rebase *ALL* your DaVinci work on top of the "devel" branch in the GPIO tree. - Repost *ALL* patches that should be applied, in one batch. - Include any accumulated ACKs etc. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpio: davinci: Redesign driver to accommodate ngpios in one gpio chip
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpio: davinci: Redesign driver to accommodate ngpios in one gpio chip
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:52:40 +0100
- In-reply-to: <1484110841-2391-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com>
- References: <1484110841-2391-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: [PATCH -next] pinctrl: ti-iodelay: Fix return value check in ti_iodelay_probe()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: mvebu: Use kmalloc_array() in mvebu_pinctrl_dt_node_to_map()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpio: davinci: Remove unwanted blank line
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpio: davinci: Redesign driver to accommodate ngpios in one gpio chip
- Index(es):
 |