Hi Krzysztof,
On 2016-12-27 16:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:30:57AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
On 2016-12-25 20:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 01:24:47PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Add support for special property "samsung,off-state", which indicates a special
state suitable for device's "sleep" state. Its pin values/properties should
match the configuration in power down mode. It indicates that pin controller
can notify runtime power management subsystem, that it is ready for runtime
suspend if its all pins are configured for such state. This in turn might
allow to turn respective power domain off to reduce power consumption.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt | 8 ++++++++
drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 4 ++++
drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt
index b7bd2e12a269..354eea0e7798 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ Required Properties:
- samsung,pin-drv: Drive strength configuration.
- samsung,pin-pud-pdn: Pull up/down configuration in power down mode.
- samsung,pin-drv-pdn: Drive strength configuration in power down mode.
+ - samsung,off-state: Mark this configuration as suitable for bank power off.
The values specified by these config properties should be derived from the
hardware manual and these values are programmed as-is into the pin
@@ -113,6 +114,13 @@ Required Properties:
Note: A child should include atleast a pin function selection property or
pin configuration property (one or more) or both.
+ Note: Special property "samsung,off-state" indicates that this state can
+ be used for device's "sleep" pins state. Its pin values/properties should
+ match the configuration in power down mode.
Why power down values cannot be used for sleep state? Why you need
separate pin control state? If pins values should match power down
configuration, then they could just be added to default state, couldn't
they?
Separate sleep state is needed because of the pin control bindings and
design.
A separate sleep state is required to let pin control client driver (in this
case
Exynos I2S driver) let to choose when it is okay to switch pads into sleep
state and I see no other way to achieve this.
Maybe the pinctrl API should be extended for this? Doing this in DTS
just for purpose of passing information between drivers (consumer and
provider) looks odd.
Well, I don't know if it is odd or not, but that's how it is used now
and I see
no reason to reinvent wheel. Please check it yourself:
$ git grep \"sleep\" arch/arm/boot/dts | wc -l
101
Anyway, you are proposing a new binding so please Cc devicetree mailing
list and device tree maintainers.
I'm just using the generic pinctrl bindings, but it might make some sense to
add a note to Exynos i2s driver that a sleep pin control state is needed if
one wants to get power domain to be turned off.
In the patch 2/9, existing configuration:
716 i2s0_bus: i2s0-bus {
(...)
719 samsung,pin-function = <EXYNOS_PIN_FUNC_2>;
720 samsung,pin-pud = <EXYNOS_PIN_PULL_NONE>;
721 samsung,pin-drv = <EXYNOS5420_PIN_DRV_LV1>;
722 };
additional configuration:
+ i2s0_bus_slp: i2s0-bus-slp {
+ samsung,pin-function = <EXYNOS_PIN_FUNC_INPUT>;
+ samsung,pin-pud = <EXYNOS_PIN_PULL_NONE>;
+ samsung,pin-drv = <EXYNOS5420_PIN_DRV_LV1>;
+ samsung,pin-con-pdn = <EXYNOS_PIN_PDN_INPUT>;
+ samsung,pin-pud-pdn = <EXYNOS_PIN_PULL_NONE>;
+ samsung,off-state;
+ };
I agree that it would be possible to get rid of "samsung,off-state" property
and
just detect off state when func/pud pair matches power down func/pud.
It indicates that pin control
+ can notify runtime power management subsystem, that it is ready for runtime
+ suspend if its all pins are configured for such state. This in turn might
+ allow to turn respective power domain off to reduce power consumption.
What do you mean by "notifying RPM subsystem"? Either this is
description of hardware in certain mode (sleep state) or this is not
device tree property.
Maybe I wrote the description with a view too limited to the kernel
operation
perspective, but if we remove the need to mark state as off, the above
description
will not be needed.
But still it wouldn't be describing any hardware property, would it?
Well, it somehow describes the hardware, because the pin state when it
is allowed
to turn off the power domain is board specific. I should move that part
to the
Odroid dts, because there might be a board which require other pin
values in power
down mode.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
