On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is a non-functional change, which deletes code duplication in two > of four if-if branches by reordering the checks. Functional identity > of the code change can be shown by running through the whole truth table > of boolean arguments. > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@xxxxxxxxx> Patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: simplify check for pin request conflicts
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: simplify check for pin request conflicts
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 10:12:05 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20161225005928.4417-1-vz@mleia.com>
- References: <20161225005928.4417-1-vz@mleia.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] pinctrl: simplify check for pin request conflicts
- From: Vladimir Zapolskiy
- [PATCH] pinctrl: simplify check for pin request conflicts
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/5] pinctrl: mvebu: pinctrl driver for 98DX3236 SoC
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/9] pinctrl: samsung: Move retention control from mach-exynos to the pinctrl driver
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] pinctrl: simplify check for pin request conflicts
- Next by thread: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] drivers: pinctrl: add driver for Allwinner H5 SoC
- Index(es):
 |