+Brian On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:19:00 +0100 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/20/2016 10:18 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > In commit d47529b2e9fe0ec2eb1f072afad8849f52e385c4 ("gpio: don't > > include module.h in shared driver header") we fixed a bunch of > > implicit includes and then did what the shortlog says -- remove > > module.h from a gpio header. > > > > In parallel, commit 024366750c2e04fdcda8bca685194ef0196b35fe > > ("mtd: nand: xway: convert to normal platform driver") added new > > modular function calls to a file that now became relying on the > > above module.h presence in the gpio header, since it did not > > explicitly include module.h header for them as part of the change. > > > > The problem only appears when the two dev streams are merged. > > > > Since the file is tristate, the fix is obvious -- it needs an > > explicit include of module.h header. > > Hi Paul, > > the xway nand driver does not build as a module, so I made it bool, this > patch: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2016-December/070800.html > And then made it use the non module versions here: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2016-December/070801.html > > In the beginning I also came up with the same patch as you, but the mtd > people suggested to do it differently. I hope my two patches are on > their way into Linus tree. Yep. Just waiting for Linus to release 4.10-rc1 to rebase my nand/next branch and start applying new patches. It should be queued for 4.11 and backported to all previous release (thanks to the Cc-stable + Fixes tags). I didn't plan to take these fixes in one of the 4.10-rc fixes PR, since this bug is here for several releases, and no-one complained before. Let me know if you think otherwise, I'll add my ack and ask Brian to take it in the MTD tree. Regards, Boris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html