On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 01:31:16PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > We switch the default handler to be handle_bad_irq() instead of > handle_simple_irq() (which was not correct anyway). > > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I wonder if it makes sense to have this split into two patches instead? In any case, Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: set default handler to be handle_bad_irq()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: set default handler to be handle_bad_irq()
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:37:40 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20161125113116.28193-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20161125113116.28193-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: set default handler to be handle_bad_irq()
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: set default handler to be handle_bad_irq()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: set explicit nesting on drivers
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] gpio: axp209: add pinctrl support
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: set default handler to be handle_bad_irq()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: set default handler to be handle_bad_irq()
- Index(es):
 |