On 11/23/2016 05:12 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Wednesday 23 November 2016 08:59 AM, David Lechner wrote:This SoC has a separate pin controller for configuring pullup/pulldown bias on groups of pins. Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi index 8945815..1c0224c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi @@ -210,6 +210,11 @@ }; }; + pinconf: pin-controller@22c00c { + compatible = "ti,da850-pupd"; + reg = <0x22c00c 0x8>; + status = "disabled"; + };Can you please place this below the i2c1 node. I am trying to keep the nodes sorted by unit address. I know thats broken in many places today, but lets add the new ones where they should eventually end up.
I can do this, but it seems that the predominant sorting pattern here is to keep subsystems together (e.g. all i2c are together, all uart are together, etc.)
Would a separate patch to sort everything by unit address to get this cleaned up be acceptable?
Thanks, Sekhar
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
