Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/23/2016 05:12 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Wednesday 23 November 2016 08:59 AM, David Lechner wrote:
This SoC has a separate pin controller for configuring pullup/pulldown
bias on groups of pins.

Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
index 8945815..1c0224c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
@@ -210,6 +210,11 @@
 			};

 		};
+		pinconf: pin-controller@22c00c {
+			compatible = "ti,da850-pupd";
+			reg = <0x22c00c 0x8>;
+			status = "disabled";
+		};

Can you please place this below the i2c1 node. I am trying to keep the
nodes sorted by unit address. I know thats broken in many places today,
but lets add the new ones where they should eventually end up.

I can do this, but it seems that the predominant sorting pattern here is to keep subsystems together (e.g. all i2c are together, all uart are together, etc.)

Would a separate patch to sort everything by unit address to get this cleaned up be acceptable?


Thanks,
Sekhar


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux