On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:16:58 +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Sören Brinkmann > <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 10:39:51 +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote: > >> Add basic clock support for xilinx gpio. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> v2 : > >> no change > >> > >> drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c > >> index 14b2a62..923cab8 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c > >> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ > >> */ > >> > >> #include <linux/bitops.h> > >> +#include <linux/clk.h> > >> #include <linux/init.h> > >> #include <linux/errno.h> > >> #include <linux/module.h> > >> @@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ > >> * @gpio_state: GPIO state shadow register > >> * @gpio_dir: GPIO direction shadow register > >> * @gpio_lock: Lock used for synchronization > >> + * @clk: Clock resource for this controller > >> */ > >> struct xgpio_instance { > >> struct of_mm_gpio_chip mmchip; > >> @@ -52,6 +54,7 @@ struct xgpio_instance { > >> u32 gpio_state[2]; > >> u32 gpio_dir[2]; > >> spinlock_t gpio_lock[2]; > >> + struct clk *clk; > >> }; > >> > >> static inline int xgpio_index(struct xgpio_instance *chip, int gpio) > >> @@ -282,6 +285,7 @@ static int xgpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> struct xgpio_instance *chip = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > >> > >> of_mm_gpiochip_remove(&chip->mmchip); > >> + clk_disable_unprepare(chip->clk); > >> > >> return 0; > >> } > >> @@ -307,6 +311,23 @@ static int xgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> > >> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chip); > >> > >> + /* Retrieve GPIO clock */ > >> + chip->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > > > > The driver should use the clock-name documented in the binding to do the > > clock lookup. > > My idea was to keep the clk name optional since there is only one clock. > Or do you think we should mandate the name if clk is provided. I'd make 'clock-names' mandatory if 'clocks' is present. That way there won't be any trouble if this IP ever consumed additional clocks in the future. Sören -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html