Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Linus,

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:07:27PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > However, it looks like the first patch from this serie is missing from
> > your tree, is there a reason for that?
> 
> No can you point it out?

Sure:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-October/462500.html

> > Also, in order to preserve bisectability, could you create an
> > immutable branch for those sunxi patches so that I can merge the DT
> > bits?
> 
> It's too late because they are already in the devel branch
> and mixed up with merged of *other* immutable stuff.

Hmmmm, ok.

> However I think it is plain wrong to try to keep any bisectability
> between the kernel at large and arch/*/boot/dts/*, because
> the DTS stuff is supposed to at some point be maintained outside
> of the kernel and for all OSes, they simply shouldn't be sync:ed.

Yes, in the case of a new driver that needs to be introduced, I
definitely get your point.

However, during a conversion like we're doing here, this is not ideal,
because it essentially means that you will not have a branch that
works, at all.

I'll hold off on those patches until 4.11 then.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux