Hi Linus, On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 13:53 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > Two LPC-related signals in the AST2400 depend on state in the > > SuperIO IP > > block. Use the recently added infrastructure to capture this > > relationship. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx> > Patch applied for v4.10. > (Tell me if I'm applying patches in wrong order or something, and > I hope this doesn't clash with the fixes.) Both this patch and 8/8 functionally depend on 5/8. I fetched the pinctrl tree to poke around but this patch didn't appear in any of the updated branches, so I'm not sure whether we have the right ordering. Without it we should hit build failures from missing macro definitions. Have you had a chance to look over patch 5/8? Joel wasn't keen on its current form, so I would appreciate your input. Cheers, Andrew > > Yours, > Linus Walleij
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
