Hi Vladimir, On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 21:06 +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > Hi Sylvain, > > On 18.10.2016 19:23, Sylvain Lemieux wrote: > > Vladimir, Linus, Alexandre, > > > > the current LPC32xx GPIO driver is broken by commit 762c2e46 > > (gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and struct gg_data). > > I do confirm, as well I've noticed that the driver is broken on v4.9, > however I didn't find time to bisect the problematic commit, thank > you to pinning it out. > > > A call to "of_get_named_gpio" to retrieve the GPIO will > > always return -EINVAL, except for the first GPIO bank. > > > > Prior to this commit, the driver was working properly > > because of the side-effect of the match function called by > > "gpiochip_find" inside "of_get_named_gpiod_flags" function. > > > > I think, the proper long-term solution is to replace the > > LPC32xx GPIO driver; an initial version was previously > > submitted, by Vladimir Zapolskiy, to the mailing list: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg09746.html > > I still cherish a hope for submitting v2 for v4.10, the difference > from v1 is expected to be relatively big (e.g. there will be 5 > banks instead of 6, on hardware level banks P0 and P1 are on the > single controller, there will be other lesser differences also). > I will be available to test the new driver, once submitted on the mailing list. > > Is there any short-term solution that can be done with > > the existing driver to keep the LPC32xx platform working > > properly in the 4.9 mainline kernel? > > Unfortunately I didn't spend enough time to fix the problem, > but in two words the root cause is that from the OF description > there is only one on-SoC GPIO controller, but the GPIO controller > driver registers multiple gpiochips (6 in this particular case), > consumers specify a bank as a value in the first cell. > The referenced commit simplifies the matter by assuming that > a number of gpiochips for consumers is the same as the number > of registered GPIO controllers from OF description. > > I don't think that the problem is specific only to the legacy > LPC32xx GPIO controller driver, but at the moment I don't have > any more examples to share. Probably another 3-cell GPIO > controller driver gpio-etraxfs.c is also broken, a good enough > implicit indicator for potentially broken drivers might be if > you see gpiochip_add_data() call inside a loop: > * gpio-sch311x.c > * gpio-ml-ioh.c > * gpio-etraxfs.c > * gpio-htc-egpio.c > * gpio-davinci.c > * gpio-lpc32xx.c > As a temporary solution, locally I reverted the following commits to be able to have a working platform on 4.9-rc1: * "gpio: of: factor out common code to a new helper function" (99468c1af913bb5662c223b68e783b4bf9200184) * "gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and struct gg_data" (762c2e46c0591d207289105c8718e4adf29b2b34) Regards, Sylvain -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html