On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:38:27AM +0800, AceLan Kao wrote: > Hi Mika, > > BTW, I failed to compile the kernel 4.4 with the patch. > > The patch uses gpiochip_line_is_irq() function which has been > introduced since 4.6-rc1, so we need to cherry pick this commit, too. > 6cee382 gpio/pinctrl: sunxi: stop poking around in private vars > > But the above commit uses gpiodev data member in struct gpio_chip > which is introduced from this commit, and it's a big commit that can't > be cherry-picked clearly. > ff2b135 gpio: make the gpiochip a real device > > Will you provide other patch that can apply on top of old stable kernels? Hmm, So 6cee382 ("gpio/pinctrl: sunxi: stop poking around in private vars") needs the following patch. I can backport 6cee382 with the below patch and send both patches to stable@ after this gets merged to mainline but not sure if that's the correct process to follow. diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index db007a3e2af7..6240dd40e8be 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -1524,7 +1524,7 @@ bool gpiochip_line_is_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) if (offset >= chip->ngpio) return false; - return test_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &chip->gpiodev->descs[offset].flags); + return test_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &chip->desc[offset].flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_line_is_irq); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html